Small Churches Aren’t Bad Churches

In today’s church landscape, there’s a tendency to equate a church’s health with its size. Bigger is better, right? More people in the pews, a larger budget, and a grandiose building are often seen as signs of a thriving church. But is this really the case? Can a small church be just as healthy, impactful, and spiritually vibrant as a mega-church? Absolutely!

In fact, the size of a church doesn’t necessarily reflect its spiritual health or the depth of its impact on its community. A small church, which I know is fairly ambiguous term these days, can be a powerhouse of faith, love, and service. Likewise, a large church can be a hollow shell, bursting at the seams with people but lacking the transformative influence that truly matters.

Note this is not a post about large versus small churches and which is better! The point is that the size of a church is not the key metric in a church’s health. Both large and small churches can be equally healthy or equally unhealthy.

It’s easy to fall into the trap of believing that a church’s size determines its effectiveness. But this is a dangerous and misguided assumption. Jesus never said, “Go, and make your church big.” or “Go and keep your church small.” Instead, He commissioned us to make disciples, love one another, and be the light of the world. These commands can be fulfilled by churches of any size.

A small church with a few dozen members can have a profound impact on its community if it is focused on fulfilling Christ’s mission. This kind of church doesn’t need to be big to be healthy. In fact, some small churches are thriving, filled with passionate believers who are deeply committed to living out the gospel in their daily lives.

On the flip side, a large church can be unhealthy if it loses sight of its true purpose. Just because a church has thousands of members doesn’t mean it’s fulfilling its mission effectively. A mega-church might have a massive budget, a polished worship team, and state-of-the-art facilities, but these things alone don’t define its health for the good or bad. If it’s not fostering genuine discipleship, building authentic community, or making a lasting difference in the lives of its members and neighbors, a church of any size is missing the mark.

True Metrics of a Healthy Church

In his book Small Church Essentials, Karl Vaters challenges the assumption that bigger is always better and offers insight into how small churches can thrive. Vaters emphasizes that church health should be measured by more than just numbers. He provides practical guidance for small churches and highlights key metrics that define a healthy congregation, regardless of size.

Here are four alternate essential metrics for measuring the health of a congregation based on Vaters’ work:

1. Authentic Relationships:
One of the strengths of a small church is its ability to foster deep, authentic relationships among its members. In a small congregation, people can know each other personally, pray for one another by name, and offer support in times of need. Healthy churches prioritize building a loving, caring community where people feel known and valued. This relational closeness is often difficult (although not impossible) to achieve in larger congregations, where it’s easier for people to slip through the cracks. A healthy church—regardless of size—focuses on cultivating genuine relationships that reflect Jesus’ love for all.

2. Spiritual Growth:
A healthy church is one that prioritizes the spiritual growth of its members. Discipleship isn’t just about attending church services; it’s about growing deeper in faith, knowledge, and obedience to Christ. A small church can be a fertile ground for spiritual growth, offering opportunities for mentoring, Bible study, and personal accountability. Healthy congregations are intentional about helping their members grow in their relationship with God, regardless of the size of their Sunday attendance.

3. Community Engagement:
A truly healthy church is outwardly focused, actively serving and engaging with the community around it. We often call that evangelism in church world. Small churches often have the advantage of being deeply embedded in their local context. They may not have the resources to run massive outreach programs, but they can have a big impact by meeting specific needs, building relationships, and being a faithful presence in their neighborhoods. A church’s health is not just measured by what happens within its walls but frequently by how effectively it extends Christ’s love beyond them.

4. Shared Leadership:
Healthy churches empower their members to step into leadership roles. In a small church, there’s often more opportunity for individuals to contribute their gifts and take on responsibilities. This can be a powerful catalyst for growth, both for the individuals involved and for the church as a whole. A healthy congregation actively invests in raising up leaders who will continue to serve, lead, and expand Jesus’ mission for His church. It’s not about having a superstar pastor or a large staff; it’s about equipping every member to live out their individual calling.

The health of a church is not measured by how many people show up on a Sunday morning. It’s about the depth of relationships, the spiritual growth of disciples, the impact on the community, and the development of leaders. Whether your church has 50 or 5,000 members, these are some things that we can’t ignore.

It’s time we reject the assumption that small churches are less effective or less important. And equally we need to reject the notion that large churches are shallow and water down the Bible. A large or small church can be a powerful force for good, bringing transformation to its members and community. Instead of focusing on numbers, let’s focus on what really counts: faithfulness to Christ’s mission. When we do that, size becomes secondary, and true health and impact emerge.